Nyt tuli mieleen tästä kahdesta eri aiheesta että onkohan näissä ilmiöissä ja niiden selityksissä jotain samankaltaisuutta
Nimittäin MAAPARISTOSSA (Earth Battery) ja Bakteeri paristossa (Bug Battery).
Stubblefieldin maaparisto voi olla myös väitetyllä tavalla toimiva, mutta haiskahtaa myös bakteeriparistolta:
http://www.rexresearch.com/stubblefield ... field.html¤
https://www.nuenergy.org/the-amazing-bug-battery/siis multaan ja maa-aineksiin kosketuksissa olevat maapariston elektrodit voivat tuottaa sähköä bakteeritoiminnan tuloksena, ainakin näissä patenteissa ennen stubblefieldiä, niin luulen
Telegraph line was not copper, neither was it insulated throughout its length. Telegraph line was bare iron wire, and was supported on porcelain insulators fixed to tarred wooden poles. Signal strength along such resistive wire would have theoretically been extremely poor, but was exceedingly strong at times. So great was the developed signal strength that operators could "remove battery cups" and work with almost no current at all. Where did this extra energy come from? From what mysterious depths did this strange power emerge? Examination of telegraph systems reveals them to be radionic tuners on a vast scale. I suggest that VRIL articulate energy, the dendritic living energy found in the ground, was at work in all these systems.
EARTH RESERVOIR
Nathan Stubblefield's experiments involved the development of earth batteries: buried metallic arrangements which produced electrical power. We find a good number of the earth battery designs in the Patent Registry. The earliest designs appeared in 1841 when Alexander Bain discovered the phenomenon. While working a telegraphic line, he chanced to discover that his leads had become immersed in water. This short-circuit through earthed water did not stop the actions which resounded through his system.
Mr. Bain took the next step to a greater distance, burying copper plates and zinc plates with a mile of ground between them. These, when connected to a telegraphic line performed remarkably well without any other battery assistance. Bain obtained a patent for his earth battery in 1841, using it to drive telegraph systems and clocks.
Stephen Vail (1837) observed the same effect, not knowing what caused it. The establishment of the first functional telegraph line seemed to require ever few batteries with time. Vail began with some 12 battery cups, reducing them gradually until 2 were needed. There came a point where he found it possible to remove even these, while operating the system.
This mystery persisted for years. I have heard such an account by a close friend and electrical engineer who reported that local telegraph stations remained in operation despite the fact that their batteries had not been recharged for a great number of years (W. Lehr).
J. W. Wilkins in England (1845) corroborated findings made by Bain, developing a similar earth battery for use in telegraphic service. An early English Patent appears in 1864 by John Haworth, the first true composite earth battery. This battery is drum shaped, having numerous solid discs mounted on an insulative axis, end braced, and buried. Their power was rated in terms of disc diameter and telegraph line distance: 1 foot diameter discs for 75 miles of line, 2 foot discs for up to 440 miles of line.
Patent Archives have revealed a great number of these devices including several remarkable operative descriptions. Earth batteries by Garratt (1868), Edard (1877), Mellon (1889), and Hicks (1890) yield therapeutic powers. Earth batteries by Bryan (1875), Cerpaux (1876), Bear (1877), Dieckmann (1885), Drawbaugh (1879), Snow (1874), Spaulding (1885), and Stubblefield (1898) produce usable power. In addition to these marvelous patents, there are those which found their way into telephonic service later: designs by Strong (1880), Brown (1881), Tomkins (1881), Lockwood (1881) provided power assistance and primary power for telephonic systems through out the countryside.
The well reputed fame of "earth batteries" centers around their very anomalous electrical behavior. The central mystery about earth batteries is that they do not corrode to the degree in which their electrical production rate theoretically demands. Exhumed earth batteries reveal little surface corrosion.
Nathan Stubblefield knew that probes (placed into various soils) reveal an amazing degree of strong electrical activity. These currents show an amazing degree of variation across any chosen plot of ground. Wet soils often reverse the expected electrical strength: weakening, instead of strengthening their appearance. Proper placements of metallic probes can produce strong currents for use.
Touching a well-grounded iron rod is a good first experiment to try in these regards. Try and find a place where power leakage into the ground is minimal, such as a park or wooded area. Take a yard-long solid iron rod whose surface is free of shellac or insulator coatings. Carefully drive the rod into the ground with a hammer. Wetted hands on the iron should produce a mild electrical sensation. These voltages may be measured. They "pin" sensitive galvanometers. The current does not cease after several weeks of activity when properly placed.
Stubblefield's observations of natural electrical manifestations led him to consider the taking of "free" electrical energy from the earth....
stubblefieldin maaparisto lienee ollut oikeasti ydinenergia paristo, koska käytti "Pitch blendeä" pikivälkettä (uraanimalmia).
vielä kermaa kakun päälle, sain kuulla maanpuolustustekniikan keskusteluissa venäläisvalmisteisen Ilmatorjuntatykin laukaisusysteemeissä käytettävästä "Maaparistosta" joka on kuin onkin < venäläinen "maaparisto" joka herätetään dynamolla tuntuu kestävän
kauemmin kuin läntiset akut,.> tämä kommentti löytyi sfnetin maanpuolustuskeskustelun narusta 17 vuotta takaperin, Antti Heikkilä käytti puheenvuoron (ei se lääkäri)