Yksi perusasia
‘Radiant’ energy = negative energy. At the time of Tesla (1888- 1943) there was no nomenclature to describe what was being captured in the circuits.
It is not ‘back EMF’ that is being recycled, but the capture of a new energy source discovered by Nikola Tesla. This ‘radiant’ energy was recently back-engineered by John C. Bedini and he demonstrated it, successfully in many demonstrations of his own, and through a series of successive reproductions and demonstrations, fulfilling the last phase of the ‘scientific’ method.
John Bedini:
...
The energy always enters through this (Bloch) wall at right angles, the energy then couples in the windings of that coil. Producing what everybody terms as Back EMF, how wrong as Back EMF is never more then the source voltage under any condition. However the energy that does couple is at the exact level of potential of the electrical gas that surrounds you. Change the impedance of the coil you change the coupling effect. Now you have my answers, this is as far as I will go. Go sit and ponder it, you won’t find it in a textbook. The next step would be to take a quantum mechanics class. I had to make this machine simple so anybody could build it.
...
These systems do NOT capture "back EMF". Back EMF is not capturable.
My patents say that my motor captures Back EMF because THAT is the only claim the Patent Office would accept. In reality, Back EMF is a term in electrical science that refers to the effect that reduces the current draw in a traction motor as the motor speeds up and generates a counter voltage that opposes the applied current. THAT is "back EMF." My systems do NOT use this process.
http://www.panaceauniversity.org/John%2 ... nology.pdf